Legal Opinion

Godell v. Johnson

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided September 28, 1966PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO’Connell, J.

This is an action to recover damages for personal injuries. Defendant appeals from a judgment for plaintiff.

Plaintiff was injured while working in defendant’s sawmill. He brought this action to recover damages for injuries allegedly resulting from a violation of the Employers’ Liability Law and the Basic Safety Code. Defendant denied negligence and alleged that plaintiff was contributorily negligent.

*589The trial was held before a jury. After both parties had rested defendant moved for a directed verdict. Plaintiff “joined in the motion” and requested the court to submit the matter to the jury…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Patty v. Salem Flouring Mills Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Phillips v. Colfax Company, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1952
  3. First Nat. Bank v. BachOregon Supreme Court · 1920
  4. Hudelson v. Sanders-Swafford Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1924
  5. Jaloff v. United Auto Indemnity ExchangeOregon Supreme Court · 1926

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Falk v. AmsberryOregon Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Towe v. Sacagawea, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 2015
  3. David v. Longenecker v. General Motors Corporation, a Corporation, Sharon Longenecker v. General Motors CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
  4. Eagle Air, Inc. v. Corroon & Black/Dawson & Co. of AlaskaAlaska Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Vandermay v. ClaytonOregon Supreme Court · 1999

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API