Legal Opinion

State v. Davis

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided June 30, 2010No. 48, September Term, 2009PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAdkins, J.

In this case we are called upon to determine whether a defense attorney’s pretrial statements to an administrative judge were sufficient to trigger a Maryland Rule 4-215(e) inquiry into the merits of the defendant’s request to discharge counsel. Maurice Davis was arrested and charged with the burglary of a McDonald’s restaurant and the robbery of two of its employees in Baltimore County. On the morning of trial in the Circuit Court for Baltimore County, defense counsel told the court that, in his earlier conversation with Davis, the defendant had expressed unhappiness with his attorney’s…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Snead v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1979
  2. Williams v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1990
  3. Crosby v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
  4. Glover v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2002
  5. State v. CampbellCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Williams v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2013
  2. State v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2013
  3. Neustadter v. Holy Cross Hospital of Silver Spring, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2011
  4. State v. GravesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2016
  5. Wood v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2012

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API