Legal Opinion

Williams v. State

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided December 7, 1990No. 19, September Term, 1989PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COLE, Judge.

In this case we are asked to decide whether the trial court’s refusal to permit the Petitioner to state his reasons for wanting to discharge his attorney was reversible error, and whether the trial court erred in denying Petitioner’s motion for a new trial because the verdicts were inconsistent.

The facts are not complicated. The Petitioner, Michael Williams, was charged by information with assault with intent to maim, attempted murder, assault, unlawfully carrying a handgun, and unlawful use of a handgun in the commission of a felony or crime of violence. The case was called for…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Powell v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  5. People v. CrandellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. State v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1996
  2. Johnson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1999
  3. Pinkney v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2012
  4. Moore v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1993
  5. Mitchell v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1995

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API