Legal Opinion

State v. Campbell

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided March 15, 2005No. 63, September Term, 2004PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBattaglia, J.

In this case we are asked to consider whether the defendant, Bernard Campbell, a.k.a. Sean Kelly, made a request to discharge counsel when he expressed dissatisfaction with his attorney during trial. If Campbell’s statements constitute a request to discharge counsel, we also must determine whether the trial court properly denied the request. We conclude that under the circumstances of this case, Campbell’s expressed dissatisfaction with his attorney qualified as a request to discharge counsel that was properly denied by the trial court.

I. Facts and Procedural History

On November 16, 2001,…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Adams v. United States Ex Rel. McCannSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  4. Don Garriga Chapman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
  5. United States v. Joan McKennaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Blake v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2006
  2. Diggs and Ramsey v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2009
  3. Grandison v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2012
  4. Williams v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2013
  5. State v. HardyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2010

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API