Legal Opinion
Crosby v. State
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Decided November 13, 2001No. 21, Sept. Term, 2001PublishedCited by 36 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BATTAGLIA, Judge.
The decisional issue in this case is whether the trial court erred in admitting testimony regarding the petitioner’s refusal to commit his oral statement — which was given to police detectives after he was advised of and waived his Miranda rights — to writing. The petitioner, Marlon Maurice Crosby, *521contends that his unwillingness to provide a written statement was an invocation of his right to remain silent and that the detective’s testimony at trial regarding such refusal was an improper use of that silence against him. We disagree. The petitioner’s decision to decline…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Doyle v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Malloy v. HoganSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Michigan v. MosleySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Fare v. Michael C.Supreme Court of the United States · 1979
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Newman v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2004
- Khalifa v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2004
- Glover v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2002
- Hill v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2012
- Coleman v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2013
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.