Legal Opinion

Glover v. State

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided March 6, 2002No. 67, Sept. Term, 2001PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BATTAGLIA, Judge.

We are required to determine whether the petitioner was denied his right to a speedy trial pursuant to the Sixth *215Amendment of the United States Constitution and Article 21 of the Maryland Declaration of Rights. We hold that, given the circumstances of this case — namely, that the delays resulted from unavailability of judges and attempts to acquire complete DNA evidence, and the fact that the record does not establish prejudice — the petitioner’s right to a speedy trial was not violated. We therefore affirm the judgment of the Court of Special Appeals, but on different…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. United States v. MarionSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Doggett v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. Dickey v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. Strunk v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1973

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Rourke v. Amchem Products, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2004
  2. Tribbitt v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2008
  3. Khalifa v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2004
  4. Polk v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2003
  5. White v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2015

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API