Legal Opinion

State v. Taylor

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided May 21, 2013No. 60PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHarrell, J.

We are confronted here with the need to determine whether pre-trial statements made by, and on behalf of, Tyres Kennard Taylor on the morning of the commencement of his retrial (and thereafter) should have been construed by the trial court *621as requests to discharge his counsel under Maryland Rule 4-215(e), or merely as a request for a continuance. Pursuant to that Rule, a court must allow a defendant to discharge his or her counsel if the court, after providing the defendant an opportunity to explain his reasons, finds that such a request is meritorious. Taylor claims that the Circuit Court…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. United States v. Gonzalez-LopezSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  3. Morris v. SlappySupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. State v. FrazierCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1984
  5. North v. NorthCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1994

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Williams v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2018
  2. Fuster v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2014
  3. Williams v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2013
  4. State v. GravesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2016
  5. Gambrill v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2014

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API