State v. Taylor
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the CourtHarrell, J.
We are confronted here with the need to determine whether pre-trial statements made by, and on behalf of, Tyres Kennard Taylor on the morning of the commencement of his retrial (and thereafter) should have been construed by the trial court *621as requests to discharge his counsel under Maryland Rule 4-215(e), or merely as a request for a continuance. Pursuant to that Rule, a court must allow a defendant to discharge his or her counsel if the court, after providing the defendant an opportunity to explain his reasons, finds that such a request is meritorious. Taylor claims that the Circuit Court…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- United States v. Gonzalez-LopezSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Morris v. SlappySupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- State v. FrazierCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1984
- North v. NorthCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1994
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Williams v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2018
- Fuster v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2014
- Williams v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2013
- State v. GravesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2016
- Gambrill v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2014
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.