Legal Opinion

Snead v. State

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided October 1, 1979No. [No. 18, September Term, 1979.]PublishedCited by 61 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtOrth, J.

I

It is now clear that an accused in a criminal prosecution has two independent constitutional rights with regard to the management of his defense. He has both the right to have the assistance of counsel and the right to defend pro se. The first is guaranteed by the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments to the federal constitution and emerged as a clear constitutional rule from a series of cases decided by the Supreme Court of the United States over the last 50 years. See, e.g., Argersinger v. Hamlin, 407 U.S. 25, 92 S. Ct. 2006 (1972); Gideon v. Wainwright, 372 U.S. 335, 83 S. Ct. 792 (1963);…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  5. Powell v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1932

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by61 opinions

  1. Williams v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1981
  2. People v. BurtonIllinois Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Colvin v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1984
  4. Fowlkes v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1988
  5. State v. SheppardWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1983

56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API