Legal Opinion

City of Indianapolis v. Murphy

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 9, 1883No. 10,781PublishedCited by 25 opinions

From the Marion Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtZollars, J.

— Action by appellee to recover for personal *383injuries through defects in a public alley. From the judgment in her favor, appellant prosecutes this appeal..On a former appeal, the complaint was held sufficient. Murphy v. City of Indianapolis, 83 Ind. 76.

The only questions argued on this appeal ai’e as to the' sufficiency of the evidence, and the giving and refusing of instructions. We do not regard the case as a strong one in favor of appellee, but as the complaint has been held sufficient, and as the evidence tends to establish all of its material averments, we can not disturb the verdict and…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. City of Indianapolis v. ScottIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
  2. Bowen v. PollardIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
  3. City of Logansport v. JusticeIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  4. Coryell v. StoneIndiana Supreme Court · 1878
  5. Murphy v. City of IndianapolisIndiana Supreme Court · 1882

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Cline v. LindseyIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Elliott v. RussellIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  3. Evansville & Terre Haute Railroad v. CristIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Musgrave v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1892
  5. Stephenson v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1887

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API