Legal Opinion
Musgrave v. State
Indiana Supreme Court
Decided December 22, 1892No. 16,579PublishedCited by 42 opinions
Erom the Vigo Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtElliott, J.
The charging part of the indictment upon which the appellant was tried and convicted reads as follows:
“That Benjamin R. Musgrave and Charles M. Trout, on the 10th day of August, 1891, at and in the county of Vigo, and State of Indiana, did then and there unlawfully, feloniously and knowingly, unite, combine and conspire, confederate and agree, to and with each other, for the object and purpose, and with thg intent to then' and there feloniously and knowingly cause it to he generally believed, in said county of Vigo, and by the United States Mutual Accident Association, of the city of New…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- United States v. CruikshankSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- Holmes, Booth & Haydens v. Holmes, Booth & Atwood Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1870
- State v. ShawOregon Supreme Court · 1892
- Hobbs v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
- Hardin v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1864
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- Eacock v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1907
- Baltimore & Ohio Southwestern Railway Co. v. ConoyerIndiana Supreme Court · 1897
- Beeman v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1953
- Fairbanks v. WarrumIndiana Court of Appeals · 1914
- Smith v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1917
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.