City of Indianapolis v. Scott

— Action by the appellee against the appellant, to recover damages for personal injuries to the plaintiff, alleged to have been caused by the negligence of the city in permitting a certain gutter-crossing to become loose, broken, rotten and unsafe. Issue, trial, verdict and judgment for the plaintiff. Judgment affirmed, on appeal to genera] term.

Questions are raised as to the sufficiency of the complaint, and as to the correctness of the ruling in overruling: a motion for a new trial.

The only objection to the complaint is, that it does not, as is claimed, show that the place where the injury…