Legal Opinion

Coryell v. Stone

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1878PublishedCited by 28 opinions

From the Shelby Common Pleas.

1Opinion of the CourtBiddle, J.

Proceedings to contest the last will and testament of Alexander Rittenhouse, on allegations filed by the. appellants, averring unsoundness of mind and undue influence.

*309Answer; issue ; trial by jury; verdict for the appellees. Judgment, over the usual motions and exceptions necessary to prepare the cause for this court, and appeal.

The only assignment of error in this court is, overruling the motion for a new trial.

We will examine the questions presented, in the order they are discussed by the appellants.

1. The first ruling of the court complained of is, sustaining a motion to challenge a juror…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Heaston v. Cincinnati & Fort Wayne RailroadIndiana Supreme Court · 1861
  2. Sutherland v. HankinsIndiana Supreme Court · 1877
  3. Kenworthy v. WilliamsIndiana Supreme Court · 1854
  4. Freeze v. DePuyIndiana Supreme Court · 1877
  5. Rush v. MegeeIndiana Supreme Court · 1871

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Staser v. HoganIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. ThompsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  3. Guetig v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1879
  4. Stephenson v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  5. Heltonville Manufacturing Co. v. FieldsIndiana Supreme Court · 1894

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API