Legal Opinion

Evansville & Terre Haute Railroad v. Crist

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided January 3, 1889No. 14,417PublishedCited by 49 opinions

From the Greene Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtElliott, J.

The complaint of the appellee is in three paragraphs; each avers that the injury for which a recovery is sought was caused by the negligence of the defendant, and that the plaintiff was injured without any fault or negligence on her part. They each contained these allegations: That the appellee lived with her father, who owned land not far from the appellant’s railroad ; that the only means of egress and ingress was a public highway; that the defendant constructed and built the last described line of railroad across, upon and along said last described highway, for a distance of three-quarters…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. GasscampTexas Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. WoodIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  3. Ohio & Mississippi Railway Co. v. WalkerIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
  4. Wabash, St. Louis & Pacific Railway Co. v. LockeIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  5. Nave v. FlackIndiana Supreme Court · 1883

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by49 opinions

  1. Kansas City, Memphis & Birmingham Railroad v. CrockerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1891
  2. Terre Haute & Indianapolis Railroad v. ClemIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. SandfordIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Alabama Great Southern Railroad v. HallSupreme Court of Alabama · 1894
  5. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co. v. McIntoshIndiana Supreme Court · 1894

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API