Evansville & Terre Haute Railroad v. Crist
Indiana Supreme Court
From the Greene Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtElliott, J.
The complaint of the appellee is in three paragraphs; each avers that the injury for which a recovery is sought was caused by the negligence of the defendant, and that the plaintiff was injured without any fault or negligence on her part. They each contained these allegations: That the appellee lived with her father, who owned land not far from the appellant’s railroad ; that the only means of egress and ingress was a public highway; that the defendant constructed and built the last described line of railroad across, upon and along said last described highway, for a distance of three-quarters…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. GasscampTexas Supreme Court · 1888
- Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. WoodIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
- Ohio & Mississippi Railway Co. v. WalkerIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
- Wabash, St. Louis & Pacific Railway Co. v. LockeIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
- Nave v. FlackIndiana Supreme Court · 1883
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by49 opinions
- Kansas City, Memphis & Birmingham Railroad v. CrockerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1891
- Terre Haute & Indianapolis Railroad v. ClemIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
- Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. SandfordIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
- Alabama Great Southern Railroad v. HallSupreme Court of Alabama · 1894
- Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co. v. McIntoshIndiana Supreme Court · 1894
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.