Legal Opinion

Murphy v. City of Indianapolis

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1882No. 9433PublishedCited by 22 opinions

From the Marion Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtElliott, J.

This is an action for injuries alleged to have-been received by the appellant while travelling upon a public-highway of the appellee. Appellant’s complaint was held bad upon demurrer.

It is contended by appellee’s counsel, that the facts alleged do not show any negligence on the part of the municipal *77authorities. We think otherwise. It is charged in direct terms that there was negligence, a description of the defect in the highway is given in detail, the time of its existence stated, and the character of the negligent omission of the municipal officers fully set forth. This must be regarded as…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Toledo, Wabash & Western Railway Co. v. BrannaganIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  2. City of Huntington v. BreenIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  3. Town of Salem v. GollerIndiana Supreme Court · 1881

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Ohio & Mississippi Railway Co. v. WalkerIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Nave v. FlackIndiana Supreme Court · 1883
  3. Cincinnati, Hamilton & Indianapolis Railroad v. MaddenIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
  4. City of Indianapolis v. CookIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  5. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co. v. PinchinIndiana Supreme Court · 1887

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API