Legal Opinion
Petronella v. Venture Partners, Ltd.
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided October 3, 2000No. AC 18759PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
O’CONNELL, J.
The plaintiff, the commissioner of labor, instituted this action on behalf of six individual claimants1 seeking the recovery of unpaid wages due from the defendants to the claimants pursuant to General Statutes § 31-72.2 The trial court found in favor of *207the plaintiff, concluding that the defendants3 Venture Partners, Ltd., Gary Laskowski and Jonathan Betts were liable for the payment of those unpaid wages. The defendants appeal, claiming that the court improperly (1) determined that the defendants were employers of the wage claimants, (2) determined that Laskowski and…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Brooklyn Savings Bank v. O'NeilSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Williams Ford, Inc. v. Hartford Courant Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- Butler ex rel. Skidmore v. Hartford Technical Institute, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
- Bizzoco v. ChinitzSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
- Nelson v. NelsonConnecticut Appellate Court · 1988
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Rund v. MelilloConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
- Johnson v. De ToledoConnecticut Appellate Court · 2000
- Esposito v. EspositoConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
- Nashid v. AndrawisConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004
- Petronella ex rel. Maiorano v. Venture Partners, Ltd.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.