Legal Opinion

Petronella ex rel. Maiorano v. Venture Partners, Ltd.

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided October 23, 2001No. SC 16433PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

2Per curiam

After examining the record on appeal and considering the briefs and oral arguments of the *454parties, we have determined that the appeal in this case should be dismissed on the ground that certification was improvidently granted.1

The appeal is dismissed.

We granted the defendants’ petition for certification to appeal from the judgment of the Appellate Court; Petronella v. Venture Partners, Ltd., 60 Conn. App. 205, 758 A.2d 869 (2000); limited to the following issue: “Were the defendants employers for purposes of General Statutes § 31-72 and thereby liable for wages due employees that were…

3Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Petronella v. Venture Partners, Ltd.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2000
  2. Petronella ex rel. Maiorano v. Venture Partners, Ltd.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2000

4Cited by5 opinions

  1. Esposito v. EspositoConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
  2. Nashid v. AndrawisConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004
  3. Commissioner of Labor v. C.J.M. Services, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2002
  4. Premier Capital, Inc. v. GrossmanConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
  5. Nicholson v. NicholsonConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API