Legal Opinion
Rund v. Melillo
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided May 1, 2001No. AC 20200PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SCHALLER, J.
The defendant Michael Melillo appeals from the judgment of the trial court, rendered after a trial to the court, in favor of the plaintiffs, William Rund and Professional Ventures, Inc. (Professional), in this breach of contract action. On appeal, Melillo claims that the court improperly (1) determined that the contract was ambiguous regarding whether the parties had bound themselves, both in an individual and corporate *218capacity, to the contract and (2) concluded that sufficient evidence was produced at trial to find that the intent of the parties was to bind both the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Levine v. Advest, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
- John M. Glover Agency v. RDB Building, LLCConnecticut Appellate Court · 2000
- Middletown Commercial Associates Ltd. Partnership v. City of MiddletownConnecticut Appellate Court · 1999
- Paul Revere Life Insurance v. PastenaConnecticut Appellate Court · 1999
- Petronella v. Venture Partners, Ltd.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2000
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- B & D Associates Inc. v. RussellConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
- Santana v. City of HartfordConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006
- Federal Deposit Insurance v. Mutual Communications Associates, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2001
- Middlesex Mutual Assurance Co. v. VaszilSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
- Bijur v. BijurConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.