Legal Opinion
Nashid v. Andrawis
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided May 25, 2004No. AC 20916PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
DiPENTIMA, J.
In this appeal from the judgment in the parties’ marital dissolution action, the defendant, Ramez Andrawis, claims that the trial court improperly (1) considered his in-court behavior at trial as a factor when determining the cause of the marital breakdown, (2) delegated its judicial authority to the attorney for the minor child and (3) entered a time limited alimony order that was unsupported by the evidence. We affirm in part and reverse in part the judgment of the trial court.
The parties, both physicians, were married in 1985. They have two children. Between 1988 and…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- American Universal Insurance v. DelGrecoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Grayson v. Wofsey, Rosen, Kweskin & KurianskySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- Schoonmaker v. Cummings & Lockwood of Connecticut, P.C.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
- Industrial Risk Insurers v. Hartford Steam Boiler Inspection & InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
- Ippolito v. IppolitoConnecticut Appellate Court · 1992
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Tuetken v. TuetkenTennessee Supreme Court · 2010
- Ng v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2010
- Nashid v. AndrawisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
- R. H. v. M. H.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2024
- Shapiro v. Hillside Village Condominium Ass'nConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004