Legal Opinion

The Humane Society Of The United States v. Clinton

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided January 4, 2001No. 99-1360PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

236 F.3d 1320 (Fed. Cir. 2001)

THE HUMANE SOCIETY OF THE UNITED STATES, HUMANE SOCIETY INTERNATIONAL, and DEFENDERS OF WILDLIFE, Plaintiffs-Appellants,

v.

WILLIAM J. CLINTON, President, NORMAN Y. MINETA, Secretary of Commerce, and MADELEINE K. ALBRIGHT, Secretary of State, Defendants-Appellees.

99-1360

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

DECIDED: January 4, 2001

Appealed from: United States Court of International Trade Judge Judith M. BarzilayPatti A. Goldman, Earthjustice Legal Defense Fund, of Seattle, Washington, argued for plaintiffs-appellants.

Lucius B. Lau, Attorney,…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Federal Deposit Insurance v. MeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Powell v. McCormackSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. United States v. Students Challenging Regulatory Agency Procedures (SCRAP)Supreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. Heckler v. RingerSupreme Court of the United States · 1984

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Consolidated Bearings Company, Plaintiff-Cross v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003
  2. Shandong Huarong MacHinery Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2006
  3. Consolidated Bearings Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
  4. Canadian Wheat Board v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2008
  5. Consolidated Fibers, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2008

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API