Legal Opinion
Heckler v. Ringer
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided May 14, 1984No. 82-1772PublishedCited by 1,422 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Rehnquist
Respondents are individual Medicare claimants who raise various challenges to the policy of the Secretary of Health and Human Services (Secretary) as to the payment of Medi*605care benefits for a surgical procedure known as bilateral carotid body resection (BCBR). The United States District Court for the Central District of California dismissed the action for lack of jurisdiction, finding that in essence respondents are claiming entitlement to benefits for the BCBR procedure and therefore must exhaust their administrative remedies pursuant to 42 U. S. C. § 405(g), before pursuing their action in…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Hagans v. LavineSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Weinberger v. SalfiSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Kerr v. United States Dist. Court for Northern Dist. of Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Heckler v. CampbellSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1,422 opinions
- Bowen v. City of New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Schweiker v. ChilickySupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Bowen v. Michigan Academy of Family PhysiciansSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Jones v. R. R. Donnelley & Sons Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Shalala v. Illinois Council on Long Term Care, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
1,417 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.