Legal Opinion

Consolidated Bearings Company, Plaintiff-Cross v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided December 30, 2003No. 02-1634, 02-1635PublishedCited by 200 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RADER, Circuit Judge.

When the United States Court of International Trade reached a final decision in a complex case involving antidumping liquidation procedures for imports, both Defendant-Appellant United States and Plaintiff-Cross Appellant Consolidated Bearings Company (Consolidated) appealed. Consolidated Bearings Co. v. United States, 02-72 (CIT July 24, 2002) (Consolidated IV). After finding it possessed jurisdiction, Consolidated Bearings Company v. United States, 166 F.Supp.2d 580 (CIT 2001) (Consolidated I), the trial court’s decision in Consolidated IV affirmed the United States…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. McKart v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Myers v. Bethlehem Shipbuilding Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. Nippon Steel Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003
  4. Miller & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
  5. Lynteq, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1992

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by200 opinions

  1. Corus Staal BV v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2007
  2. Norsk Hydro Canada, Inc. v. United States, and U.S. Magnesium LLCCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
  3. Shinyei Corporation of America v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
  4. Mittal Steel Point Lisas Ltd. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008
  5. Xinjiamei Furniture (Zhangzhou) Co., Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2014

195 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API