Legal Opinion
Canadian Wheat Board v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
Decided October 20, 2008No. Consol. 07-00058PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
EATON, Judge.
This matter is before the court on the motions of plaintiffs Canadian Wheat Board (“CWB”) and the Governments of Canada 1 (collectively, “plaintiffs”) for summary judgment pursuant to USCIT Rule 56(c) and the motion of defendant the United States to dismiss plaintiffs’ case pursuant to USCIT Rules 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(5).
In bringing this action, plaintiffs seek to compel the liquidation, without the imposition of unfair trade duties, of certain entries of hard red spring (“HRS”) wheat imported into the United States from Canada. Specifically, plaintiffs contend that, because…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Bennett v. SpearSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- DaimlerChrysler Corp. v. CunoSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- FW/PBS, Inc. v. City of DallasSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Canadian Wheat Board v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2011
- Canadian Wheat Board v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2009
- Gold East Paper (Jiangsu) Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2015
- Gold East Paper (Jiangsu) Co., Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2015
- Snap-on, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2013
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.