Consolidated Fibers, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GORDON, Judge.
Plaintiffs move for judgment on the agency record pursuant to USCIT R. 56.1, challenging the United States International Trade Commission’s (“Commission”) refusal to reconsider the original injury determination underlying the antidumping duty order on polyester staple fiber (“PSF”) from Korea and Taiwan. For the reasons set forth below, the court denies Plaintiffs’ motion.
I. Background
In March 2005 the Commission instituted five-year reviews (“sunset reviews”) of the antidumping duty orders on PSF from Korea and Taiwan. After the sunset reviews commenced, Plaintiffs…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Heckler v. ChaneySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Longkou Haimeng MacHinery Co., Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2008
- Kyd, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2009
- Nucor Fastener Division v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2011
- Consolidated Fibers, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2008
- Deseado International, Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2009
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.