Legal Opinion

Home Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Sanitary Fish Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 25, 1930No. 21957. Department OnePublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBeals, J.

This action was commenced by Home Savings & Loan Association, a corporation, which filed its complaint asking for judgment on a note and the foreclosure of a mortgage, naming as defendants Sanitary Fish Co., a corporation, and the Carrolls. Jacob Borish and L. Walter were later made additional parties defendant, and filed their answer and cross-complaint asking for judgment on a note of the defendant Sanitary Fish Co. and the foreclosure of a second mortgage given to secure the same.

No issue is raised here concerning the note and mortgage in favor of Home Savings & Loan Association, the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Libert v. UnfriedWashington Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Inland Trading Co. v. EdgecombeWashington Supreme Court · 1910
  3. Ridgway v. DavenportWashington Supreme Court · 1905
  4. Miesen v. MotterWashington Supreme Court · 1921
  5. Western Loan & Building Co. v. McGillivraeWashington Supreme Court · 1926

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Liebergesell v. EvansWashington Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Busk v. HoardWashington Supreme Court · 1964
  3. Clausing v. Virginia Lee Homes, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Tacoma Hotel, Inc. v. Morrison Co., Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1938
  5. Ostiguy v. A. F. Franke Construction, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1959

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API