Legal Opinion

Ridgway v. Davenport

Washington Supreme Court

Decided February 21, 1905No. 4978PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Rudldn, J., entered November 11, 1903, in favor of the plaintiffs, after a trial before the court ivithout a jury, decreeing the satisfaction and cancellation of a chattel mortgage.

1Opinion of the CourtDunbar, J.

Davenport & Hall are engaged in the real estate, money loaning, insurance, and brokerage business in the city of Seattle. Lee Davenport is a member of this firm. J. R. Davenport is a resident of Butte, Montana, and a brother of Lee Davenport. Davenport & Hall loaned money for J. R. Davenport, under general power of attorney, keeping his money in a bank in Seattle in their name. The respondent Ridgway, desiring to borrow $150 on chattel security, went to Davenport & Hall, who finally agreed to give him $125 on the security. They added to this $125, $3.ÍS for interest, and made the note for *135$147…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Tacoma Commercial Bank v. ElmoreCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1977
  2. Home Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Sanitary Fish Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Washington Fire Insurance v. Maple Valley Lumber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Ostiguy v. A. F. Franke Construction, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1959
  5. Testera v. RichardsonWashington Supreme Court · 1914

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API