Legal Opinion

Clausing v. Virginia Lee Homes, Inc.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided August 15, 1963No. 36601PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWeaver, J.

This is an action for judgment on a promissory note and for the foreclosure of a real estate and chattel mortgage. Defendants pleaded, and the court found, that the transaction was usurious.

After trial on the merits, the court entered judgment in favor of plaintiffs for $51,827.60, together with interest, and directed foreclosure of the mortgages.

There is a wide divergence between the claims of the parties. Defendants appeal, claiming that after the application of the statutory penalty for usury to the transaction, they have overpaid plaintiffs $729.99. Plaintiffs cross-appeal, contending…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Home Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Sanitary Fish Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Libert v. UnfriedWashington Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Richardson v. FosterWashington Supreme Court · 1918
  4. Western Loan & Building Co. v. LarsenWashington Supreme Court · 1920
  5. Celian v. Coast Finance Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1937

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Busk v. HoardWashington Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Security Insurance Company of Hartford v. HouserSupreme Court of Colorado · 1976
  3. Aetna Finance Co. v. DarwinCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1984
  4. Easter v. American West FinancialCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
  5. Atlas Credit of California, Inc. v. HillCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1976

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API