Legal Opinion

Inland Trading Co. v. Edgecombe

Washington Supreme Court

Decided February 4, 1910No. 8247PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeals by plaintiff and a defendant from a judgment of the superior court for Spokane county, Warren, J., entered January 28, 1909, upon findings in favor of a codefendant, in an action to foreclose a chattel mortgage.

1Opinion of the CourtGose, J.

The appellant, a junior mortgagee, instituted this action against its co-appellant, the mortgagor, and the respondent, a prior mortgagee, for the purpose of foreclosing a chattel mortgage on a quantity of wheat, alleged to be in the possession of respondent, and to secure an accounting. The respondent answered, admitting the possession of the wheat, setting forth his prior mortgage, the specific indebtedness secured by it, and certain enumerated advances made to the mortgagor subsequent to the execution of his mortgage, and alleging that the security is insufficient to satisfy the mortgage…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. McNamara v. GargettMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Miller v. Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1896
  3. Missouri, K. & T. Trust Co. v. KrumseigCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1896
  4. Dunsmuir v. Port Angeles Gas, Water, Electric Light & Power Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1901
  5. Schiffer v. FeaginSupreme Court of Alabama · 1874

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Uhler v. City of OlympiaWashington Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Blaisdell v. SteinfeldArizona Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Elmendorf-Anthony Co. v. DunnWashington Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Home Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Sanitary Fish Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1930
  5. Ostiguy v. A. F. Franke Construction, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1959

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API