Legal Opinion

Miesen v. Motter

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 15, 1921No. 16233PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Lewis county, Eeynolds, J., entered July 6, 1920, upon findings in favor of the plaintiff, in an action to foreclose a deed intended as a-mortgage, tried to the court.

1Opinion of the CourtMount, J.

This action was brought to foreclose a deed which was in fact a mortgage given as security for money advanced by the plaintiff to the defendants. The trial resulted in a judgment for the plaintiff. The defendants have appealed.

The facts are as follows: The respondent, Mr. Miesen, and the appellant Mr. Motter were warm personal friends. Mr. Motter desired to construct a sawmill at Dupont, in Pierce county, but had no means to finance the same. His friend Mr. Miesen offered to help him finance the sawmill. Mr. Miesen did not have money of his own and applied to Edelmann Brothers for a loan of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Thayer v. HarbicanWashington Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Matson v. FrankWashington Supreme Court · 1915

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Seattle School District No. 1 v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Puget Sound Mutual Savings Bank v. LillionsWashington Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Home Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Sanitary Fish Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1930
  4. Beadle v. BartaWashington Supreme Court · 1942
  5. Seattle School District No. 1 v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API