Legal Opinion

Busk v. Hoard

Washington Supreme Court

Decided October 29, 1964No. 36940PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHale, J.

Usury has long been recognized as a social and economic evil affecting not only the parties to the transaction but society in general. Being widely regarded thus and condemned by law as well, it is frequently hidden by legalistic devices and cloaked in dissimulation. When, therefore, usury is claimed as a defense, the courts must, after looking beneath the surface of a transaction, examine it in all its ramifications to see if the defense is valid. In this suit to foreclose a real-estate mortgage, the answer sets up usury as a defense, but the basic problem is one of agency.

Maurice A. and…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Chase v. BeardWashington Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Rocky Mountain Fire & Casualty Co. v. RoseWashington Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Freeman v. NavarreWashington Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Clausing v. Virginia Lee Homes, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Turnbull v. SheltonWashington Supreme Court · 1955

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Feature Realty, Inc. v. City of SpokaneCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  2. Moss v. VadmanWashington Supreme Court · 1969
  3. Rho Company v. Department of RevenueWashington Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Stansfield v. Douglas CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2001
  5. Schmitt v. MatthewsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1975

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API