Arp v. Kerrigan
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtLent, J.
This is an action at law for damages allegedly resulting from negligence of the defendant in his profession as lawyer in prosecuting for plaintiff a cause of action for damages for personal injuries. In answering special interrogatories the jury found that defendant was not negligent as alleged in plaintiff’s complaint. Plaintiff appeals from the resulting judgment for defendant for costs and disbursements. We affirm.
Plaintiff alleges that defendant was negligent in prosecuting certain claims for damages for her. In particular she alleges that although he filed actions upon these claims…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Stewart v. Jefferson Plywood CompanyOregon Supreme Court · 1970
- Hodges v. CarterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
- Ireland v. MitchellOregon Supreme Court · 1961
- Willamette Western Corp. v. LowryOregon Supreme Court · 1977
- Ballou v. Blitz-Weinhard Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1967
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Ahern v. GaussoinDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1985
- Barry v. Don Hall LaboratoriesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982
- Leggett v. First Interstate Bank of Or.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1987
- Childers v. SpindorCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987
- Page v. CushingCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.