Legal Opinion

Ballou v. Blitz-Weinhard Co.

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided March 1, 1967PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLhsk, J.

Plaintiff brought this action to recover damages for injuries suffered by him as the result of the alleged explosion of a beer bottle containing beer manufactured and sold by the defendant. He sued for breach of implied warranty. The accident occurred in a restaurant where plaintiff’s wife was employed as a bartender. Plaintiff testified that to assist his wife he was placing bottles of beer in a refrigerator when one of the bottles exploded. The jury returned a verdict for the defendant and plaintiff has appealed, assigning as error the court’s refusal to give six instructions requested by…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Wights v. Staff Jennings, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Cotton v. Ship-By-Truck Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1935
  3. Centennial Mills, Inc. v. BensonOregon Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Chicago House-Wrecking Co. v. Stewart Lumber Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1902

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. StarkCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1971
  2. State v. GaylorCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1974
  3. Barry v. Don Hall LaboratoriesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982
  4. Arp v. KerriganOregon Supreme Court · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API