Legal Opinion
Ahern v. Gaussoin
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided May 10, 1985No. Civ. 83-1167-RE, 83-1963-RE to 83-1965-REPublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
REDDEN, District Judge:
Plaintiffs in these actions are holders of 30 day variable rate demand notes issued by Tradex, Inc. (Tradex), an Oregon corporation. They seek relief based on numerous alleged violations of federal and state security laws, as well as on certain other statutory and common law claims. Plaintiffs move for partial summary judgment in their favor. All defendants have filed cross motions for partial summary judgment.
Background
I. Parties and Posture of the Litigation
I am consolidating these four cases for all purposes (see pp. 69-70). In each case there are four separate…
2Cases cited77 opinions
- Ernst & Ernst v. HochfelderSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- TSC Industries, Inc. v. Northway, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Blue Chip Stamps v. Manor Drug StoresSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Affiliated Ute Citizens of Utah v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Securities and Exchange Commission v. W. J. Howey Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
72 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Moore v. Kayport Package Express, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- Hines v. Data Line Systems, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1990
- Baker, Watts & Co. v. Miles & StockbridgeCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1993
- In Re Citisource, Inc. Securities LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1988
- Blake v. DierdorffCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.