Legal Opinion

Childers v. Spindor

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided March 18, 1987No. 16-84-04654; CA A36636PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDeits, J.

This malpractice case arose out of defendant’s legal representation of plaintiff in the dissolution of her marriage to Janelli. After the dissolution trial, plaintiff filed this malpractice action contending that as a result of defendant’s negligence in representing her in the dissolution trial, defendant failed to offer sufficient proof of various financial matters between the parties which resulted in Janelli receiving a disproportionately large share of the marital assets. The jury returned a general verdict for plaintiff. Defendant appeals arguing that the court erred in failing to grant…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Getchell v. MansfieldOregon Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Collins v. GreensteinHawaii Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Northwestern Pacific Indemnity Co. v. Junction City Water Control DistrictOregon Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Sommerfeldt v. TrammellCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
  5. Hoekstre v. Golden B. Products, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1985

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Wastvedt v. VaalerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Childers v. SpindorCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
  3. Butler v. ThorpeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API