Page v. Cushing
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the Court
*692YOUNG, J.
In this legal malpractice action, plaintiff claims that defendant negligently represented him in an earlier transaction involving a land sale contract that resulted in a judgment of strict foreclosure against plaintiff. A jury returned a special verdict finding plaintiff 95 percent negligent and defendant five percent negligent. Judgment was entered in favor of defendant, and plaintiff appeals. We reverse.
Plaintiff alleged nine specifications of negligence in his amended complaint. Some charge defendant with negligence in defending the foreclosure action, while others charge him with…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Carter v. MoberlyOregon Supreme Court · 1972
- Harding v. BellOregon Supreme Court · 1973
- State v. MadisonOregon Supreme Court · 1981
- City of Reedsport v. HUBBARD ET UX.Oregon Supreme Court · 1954
- Swick v. MUELLER ET UX.Oregon Supreme Court · 1951
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Rowen v. GonenneCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
- Wilkinson v. WalkerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987
- Page v. CushingCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986