Barry v. Don Hall Laboratories
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtVan Hoomissen, J.
Plaintiff brought this action for personal injuries on theories of strict liábility, negligent failure to warn and breach of warranty. He alleged that he suffered substantial tooth decay because he used defendant’s vitamins, which had a high sugar content but ho warning or list of ingredients. After the trial court granted defendant’s motion to strike plaintiffs cause of action for negligence, a jury verdict was returned in favor of defendant. Plaintiff appeals. We reverse.
Plaintiff assigns as errors: (1) the trial court’s giving or not giving certain instructions; (2) the trial court’s…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- McEwen v. Ortho Pharmaceutical CorporationOregon Supreme Court · 1974
- Phillips v. Kimwood MacHine CompanyOregon Supreme Court · 1974
- Heaton v. Ford Motor Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1967
- Myers v. Cessna Aircraft CorporationOregon Supreme Court · 1976
- Markle v. Mulholland's, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1973
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Laura Hollister, American Community Mutual Insurance Company, Intervenor v. Dayton Hudson CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
- Chancler v. American Hardware Mutual InsuranceIdaho Supreme Court · 1985
- Wood v. Ford Motor Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
- State ex rel. Castillo v. ClarkSupreme Court of Missouri · 1994
- Willamette Essential Oils, Inc. v. Herrold & Jensen Implement Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.