Legal Opinion

Premier Capital, Inc. v. Grossman

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided February 5, 2002No. AC 21469PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

FLYNN, J.

The defendants, David S. Grossman and Myma S. Grossman, appeal from the judgment of the trial court rendered in favor of the plaintiff, Premier Capital, Inc., on its complaint and on the defendants’ counterclaim following the court’s adoption of the findings and recommendations contained in the report of an attorney fact finder (fact finder). On appeal, the defendants, who are husband and wife, claim that the court improperly accepted the fact finder’s report because (1) the fact finder inappropriately allowed a computer generated record to be admitted as evidence of the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Ferreira v. PringleSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
  2. Noble v. WhiteConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
  3. Genovese v. J. N. Clapp Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1985
  4. Twachtman v. HastingsConnecticut Appellate Court · 1999

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Franc v. Bethel Holding Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2002
  2. Fadner v. Commissioner of Revenue ServicesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
  3. Banks Building Co. v. Malanga Family Real Estate Holding, LLCConnecticut Appellate Court · 2007
  4. Tang v. Bou-FakhreddineConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
  5. Martin v. Stop & Shop Supermarket Companies, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2002

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API