Martin v. Stop & Shop Supermarket Companies, Inc.
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
FLYNN, J.
In this premises liability action, the plaintiff, Michele Martin, appeals from the judgment of the trial court rendered in favor of the defendant, Stop and Shop Supermarket Companies, Inc. On appeal, the plaintiff claims that the trial court improperly (1) con-*251eluded that she failed to prove that a defect existed and (2) failed to give proper weight to the defendant’s answers to interrogatories. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
The following facts and procedural history are relevant to our disposition of this appeal. On July 7, 1997, the plaintiff fell and sustained…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Cruz v. DrezekSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1978
- Gulycz v. Stop & Shop CompaniesConnecticut Appellate Court · 1992
- Maloney v. PCRE, LLCConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
- State v. JonesConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
- Premier Capital, Inc. v. GrossmanConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
3Cited by10 opinions
- Baptiste v. Better Val-U Supermarket, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
- Dominguez v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2013
- Palmieri v. Stop & Shop Companies, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2007
- Diaz v. Manchester Memorial HospitalConnecticut Appellate Court · 2015
- Gibson v. Denmo's Original Drive-In, LLCConnecticut Appellate Court · 2025
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.