Legal Opinion
Ferreira v. Pringle
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided February 13, 2001No. SC 16229PublishedCited by 75 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KATZ, J.
The dispositive issue in this appeal is whether a condition that allegedly caused injuries to the plaintiff, Geraldo Ferreira, is, as a matter of law, a “highway defect” within the meaning of General Statutes § lSa-149,1 the defective highway statute. The trial *332court concluded that the allegations of the plaintiffs complaints in two separate actions, consolidated by agreement, invoked the defective highway statute, and that, therefore, the exclusive remedy for his injuries was through § 13a-149. See Ferreira v. Pringle, Superior Court, judicial district of New London at New…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Gurliacci v. MayerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- Sanzone v. Board of Police CommissionersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- State v. RodriguezSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Barde v. Board of TrusteesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Mahoney v. LensinkSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by75 opinions
- Conboy v. StateSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
- Cogswell v. American Transit InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
- Webster Bank v. ZakSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
- Provencher v. Town of EnfieldSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
- Edmands v. Cuno, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
70 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.