Legal Opinion
Twachtman v. Hastings
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided April 13, 1999No. AC 17924PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
LANDAU, J.
The defendant, Frank Hastings, appeals from the judgment of foreclosure by sale rendered by the trial court in favor of the plaintiff, Walter Twacht-man, Jr., on a mortgage Hastings gave to Twachtman. The mortgage secured a note for payment for professional services by Twachtman to Hastings in various legal matters from 1986 to 1990. On appeal, Hastings claims that (1) the trial court improperly failed to apply the standards set out in Konover Development Corp. v. Zeller, 228 Com. 206, 635 A.2d 798 (1994), in ascertaining whether Twachtman violated his fiduciary duty to…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Pandolphe's Auto Parts, Inc. v. Town of ManchesterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Beverly Hills Concepts, Inc. v. Schatz & Schatz, Ribicoff & KotkinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
- Westport Taxi Service, Inc. v. Westport Transit DistrictSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- Konover Development Corp. v. ZellerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- Natural Harmony, Inc. v. NormandSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Noble v. WhiteConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
- Premier Capital, Inc. v. GrossmanConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
- Hartford Insurance v. Colonia InsuranceConnecticut Appellate Court · 2000
- Twachtman v. HastingsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
- Willow Funding C. v. Grencom Associates, No. Cv 95-0146003 S (Jan. 19, 2000)Connecticut Superior Court · 2000