Legal Opinion
Banks Building Co. v. Malanga Family Real Estate Holding, LLC
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided July 3, 2007No. AC 27822PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BISHOP, J.
This case concerns a construction contract dispute. The matter was referred to an attorney fact finder, who filed a report, on the basis of which the trial court subsequently rendered judgment in favor of the plaintiff, Banks Building Company, LLC. The defendant, Malanga Family Real Estate Holding, LLC, claims on appeal that the judgment was premised on an erroneous conclusion by the court that the defendant had waived a provision of the contract. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
The following facts and procedural history are relevant to our discussion of the issues…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Tedesco v. City of StamfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- Tedesco v. City of StamfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- Jenkins v. Indemnity Insurance Co. of North AmericaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1964
- Tedesco v. City of StamfordConnecticut Appellate Court · 1991
- Town of Ridgefield v. Eppoliti Realty Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2002
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Blackwell v. MahmoodConnecticut Appellate Court · 2010
- Hornung v. HornungSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2016
- Mastroianni v. Fairfield County Paving, LLCConnecticut Appellate Court · 2008
- RBC Nice Bearings, Inc. v. SKF USA, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2013
- Grey v. Connecticut Indemnity Services, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2009
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.