Legal Opinion
Noble v. White
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided October 2, 2001No. AC 20809PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*55 Opinion
SPEAR, J.
The plaintiff, Christopher C. Noble, appeals from the judgment of the trial court, rendered following a trial to the court, awarding him $6000 in legal fees for his representation of the defendants, Carl E. White and Kathryn White. The plaintiffs sole claim is that the court improperly found that the attorney’s fee agreement was void and unenforceable. We reverse the judgment of the trial court.1
The court found the following facts. In 1992, the defendants found themselves in financial difficulties, facing the imminent foreclosure of their home, with a law day set in…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Weisman v. KasparSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- Jenks v. JenksSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- Spector v. KonoverConnecticut Appellate Court · 2000
- Mills v. MillsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1857
- Bugryn v. City of BristolConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Town of Southington v. Commercial Union InsuranceConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
- Lussier v. SpinnatoConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
- Premier Capital, Inc. v. GrossmanConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
- Chase Manhattan Mortgage Corp. v. MachadoConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004
- Parley v. ParleyConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.