Legal Opinion

State v. Lindquist

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 20, 1927No. 26,012PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Lees, C.

This is an appeal from a judgment of the municipal court of the city of Minneapolis, rendered upon the conviction of the defendant of a violation of an ordinance regulating the construction of buildings. Section 206 of the ordinance reads in part as follows:

“It shall be unlawful for any person * * * to commence or proceed with any inside plastering or outside stucco work on any building * * * in the City of Minneapolis without first obtaining and having a permit therefor from the Inspector of Buildings, * * * and all such work shall be done under the supervision and subject to the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. In re WilsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1884
  2. State v. DirnbergerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1922
  3. Jewell Belting Co. v. Village of BerthaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1903
  4. State ex rel. Minces v. SohoenigSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1898
  5. State v. Amor & Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1922

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Cook v. TrovattenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1937
  2. Williamson v. CainSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
  3. Papenhausen v. SchoenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
  4. State v. Clarke Plumbing & Heating, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1952
  5. State v. PalmerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1942

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API