Legal Opinion
State v. Lindquist
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided May 20, 1927No. 26,012PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Lees, C.
This is an appeal from a judgment of the municipal court of the city of Minneapolis, rendered upon the conviction of the defendant of a violation of an ordinance regulating the construction of buildings. Section 206 of the ordinance reads in part as follows:
“It shall be unlawful for any person * * * to commence or proceed with any inside plastering or outside stucco work on any building * * * in the City of Minneapolis without first obtaining and having a permit therefor from the Inspector of Buildings, * * * and all such work shall be done under the supervision and subject to the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- In re WilsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1884
- State v. DirnbergerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1922
- Jewell Belting Co. v. Village of BerthaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1903
- State ex rel. Minces v. SohoenigSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1898
- State v. Amor & Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1922
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Cook v. TrovattenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1937
- Williamson v. CainSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
- Papenhausen v. SchoenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
- State v. Clarke Plumbing & Heating, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1952
- State v. PalmerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1942
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.