Legal Opinion

Cook v. Trovatten

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 11, 1937No. 31,019PublishedCited by 71 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Stone, Justice.

Action against defendant Trovatten, as commissioner of agriculture, and defendant New Amsterdam Casualty Company, as surety on his official bond, wherein the complaint encountered a general demurrer by each defendant. From the orders sustaining the demurrers, plaintiff appeals.

Plaintiff’s case, as made by the complaint, is in substance this: The Austin Poultry & Egg Company, Inc. had been engaged in business as a licensed wholesale dealer. Its license and bond expired May 31, 1935. Quoting from the complaint, the Austin company “on June i, 1935, applied to the said commissioner…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. People v. MayIllinois Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Stevens v. North States Motor, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
  3. State ex rel. Early v. WunderlichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1920
  4. Jewell Belting Co. v. Village of BerthaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1903
  5. Howley v. ScottSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1913

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by71 opinions

  1. Elwood v. County of RiceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
  2. Rico v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1991
  3. Gordon v. FrankCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2006
  4. Johnson v. MorrisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
  5. Watson v. Metropolitan Transit CommissionSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1996

66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API