State v. Palmer
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Loring, Justice.
This is an appeal from a judgment convicting defendants of the violation of an ordinance of the city of Minneapolis called “Interurban and Suburban Motor Omnibuses Ordinance” passed October 25, 1918, forbidding the carrying of passengers for hire in a motor omnibus from any place within the city of Minneapolis to any place outside that city or vice versa over or upon any public street or highway in the city without first securing a license from the city council and paying the license fee.
The question presented is the validity of the ordinance. The defendants contend that the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State v. CassidySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1875
- Chicago Motor Coach Co. v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1929
- C. Thomas Stores Sales System, Inc. v. SpaethSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1941
- Schultz v. City of DuluthSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
- City of St. Paul v. Twin City Motor Bus Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1932
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Priorities USA v. Wisconsin Elections CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 2024
- State v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1970
- City of Duluth v. Northland Greyhound LinesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1952