Legal Opinion
State v. Dirnberger
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided April 21, 1922No. 22,747PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHallam, J.
1. In April, 1921, defendant commenced the operation of a public laundry at Nineteenth street and Third avenue south, in Minneapolis. In June, 1921, defendant applied to the city council for a permit to conduct his laundry. The permit was refused. He continued to operate, a complaint was filed against him for operating a laundry without a permit and he was tried and convicted. Hé appeals.
The ordinance under which he is prosecuted reads as follows:
“Section 1. No person * * * shall hereafter erect, keep, operate or maintain within the limits of the city of Minneapolis any laundry * * * unless…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Fischer v. St. LouisSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
- Tugman v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1875
- State ex rel. McCue v. Sheriff of Ramsey CountySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
- State ex rel. Luria v. WagenerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1897
- City of St. Paul v. KesslerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1920
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- State Ex Rel. v. HoughtonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
- State ex rel. Beery v. HoughtonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
- State v. PehrsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1939
- Sverkerson v. City of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1939
- State v. MorrowSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1928
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.