Legal Opinion

State v. Clarke Plumbing & Heating, Inc.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided December 26, 1952No. 35,802PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

238 Minn. 192 (1952)

STATE

v.

CLARKE PLUMBING & HEATING, INC.[1]

No. 35,802.

Supreme Court of Minnesota.

December 26, 1952.

L.W. Crawhall, for appellant.

John F. Bonner, City Attorney, Leo P. McHale, Assistant City Attorney, and Raymond H. Hegna, Assistant City Attorney, for the State.

LORING, CHIEF JUSTICE.

This is a prosecution for the violation of an ordinance of the city of Minneapolis brought in the municipal court of that city. Defendant is a corporation engaged in the business of installing heating and plumbing equipment and is licensed by the city of Minneapolis to install heating systems as…

2Cases cited58 opinions

  1. Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Lovell v. City of GriffinSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. Clark v. Paul Gray, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
  4. Power Manufacturing Co. v. SaundersSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  5. Hanover Fire Insurance v. HardingSupreme Court of the United States · 1926

53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Mangold Midwest Co. v. Village of RichfieldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1966
  2. St. Paul Citizens for Human Rights v. City Council of St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
  3. Arcadia Development Corp. v. City of BloomingtonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1964
  4. Kronschnabel v. City of Saint PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
  5. State v. CastellanoCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1993

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API