Legal Opinion

Williamson v. Cain

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided August 13, 1976No. 46224PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Per curiam

Richard Cain and Rene Riendeau (hereafter defendants), who are state employees, appeal from a judgment holding them liable in damages for injury to plaintiffs' property. We affirm.

This action arose out of a state government program to dismantle and remove abandoned houses on Minnesota’s Iron Range. Defendants were employees of the Iron Range Resources and Rehabilitation Commission, the state agency which, through a special division, conducted the removal program. Plaintiffs are landowners on the Iron Range.

On May 7,1974, defendants undertook the removal of a house owned by Harry and! Freda…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Nieting v. BlondellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
  2. Cook v. TrovattenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1937
  3. People v. MayIllinois Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Nelson v. BabcockSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1933
  5. Johnson v. County of SteeleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1953

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Elwood v. County of RiceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
  2. Cairl v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  3. Nusbaum v. County of Blue EarthSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
  4. Larson Ex Rel. Larson v. Independent School District No. 314, BrahamSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
  5. Wiederholt v. City of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1998

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API