Jewell Belting Co. v. Village of Bertha
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by plaintiff from an order of the district court for Todd county, Searle, J., denying a motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or for a new trial.
1Opinion of the Court
BROWN, J.2
Action to recover the value of certain fire extinguishing apparatus alleged to have been purchased of plaintiff’s assignor by defendant, in which, on trial, the court below directed a verdict for defendant, and plaintiff appealed from an order denying its alternative motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict, or for 'a new trial.
The facts are as follows: Defendant is an incorporated village of the state, and on January 9, 1902, one S. S. Smith, doing business as the Minnesota Rubber Company, appeared before its council with a *10proposition to sell to the village a hand pump…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Thomson v. Mayor of BoonvilleSupreme Court of Missouri · 1875
- Phelps v. . Mayor, Etc., of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
- House v. Los Angeles CountyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- Matthews v. City of AlexandriaSupreme Court of Missouri · 1878
- Newbery v. FoxSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1887
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Cook v. TrovattenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1937
- City of Louisville v. ParsonsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1912
- Williams v. SmithSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
- State Tax Commission of Utah v. KatsisUtah Supreme Court · 1936
- Plymouth Foam Products, Inc. v. City of Becker, MinnesotaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1997
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.