Legal Opinion
Puri v. Gonzales
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided September 28, 2006No. 05-36182PublishedCited by 37 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TASHIMA, Circuit Judge.
Dewan Puri (“Puri”), a native and citizen of India, filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus (his second) in the district court, challenging a January 15, 1997, order of deportation, which ordered Puri deported to India. The district court dismissed Puri’s petition for lack of jurisdiction pursuant to the REAL ID Act and Puri filed a timely notice of appeal.
We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1291 and 2253(a), and we affirm. We review de novo a district court’s decision to dismiss a habeas corpus petition for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. See Taniguchi v.…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. St. CyrSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Maria Martinez-Rosas v. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- Swain v. PressleySupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Daniel Magana-Pizano v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- Taniguchi v. SchultzCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- Vijendra K. Singh v HolderCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Reeb v. ThomasCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Bailey v. HillCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- Garcia De Rincon v. Department of Homeland SEC.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Mark Munns v. John F. KerryCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.