Legal Opinion
Taniguchi v. Schultz
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided August 23, 2002No. Nos. 00-16928, 00-71053PublishedCited by 172 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HUG, Circuit Judge.
Virginia Agustín Taniguchi appeals both the Board of Immigration Appeals’ denial of her motion to reopen as well as the District Court’s denial of Taniguchi’s habe-as corpus petition. The Immigration Judge ordered Taniguchi removed, and she did not appeal that decision, but subsequently filed a motion to reopen on the grounds that she is a United States citizen. However, because Taniguchi filed her motion more than 90 days following the date of the final administrative decision, the Immigration Judge dismissed her motion as untimely. The BIA affirmed the Immigration…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Yick Wo v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Williamson v. Lee Optical of Oklahoma, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Kleindienst v. MandelSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Fiallo Ex Rel. Rodriguez v. BellSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Fong Yue Ting v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by172 opinions
- Baltazar Hernandez Barron Margarita Hernandez Ramirez v. John Ashcroft, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Soberanes v. ComfortCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2004
- Svitlana Denko v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
- Timms v. JohnsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2010
- Jatinder Pal Singh v. John Ashcroft, Attorney General Charles H. DemoreCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
167 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.